It sounds like a perfect english accent to me...

I confirm, it is usual in Spain and Latin America to have a female midle name, and the same thing for women (ex: "Maria José").

I would say "Death of a Soldier"...

According to Amazon.com,

GBU has spanish subtitles (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0001GF2DS/qid=1116534158/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/002-0060070-4233668?v=glance&s=dvd)

FDM too (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0792839056/qid=1116534158/sr=1-3/ref=sr_1_3/002-0060070-4233668?v=glance&s=dvd)

OUTA too (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0000DI87S/qid=1116534158/sr=1-6/ref=sr_1_6/002-0060070-4233668?v=glance&s=dvd)

but not the others american releases.

Amazon fr has no information at all about subtitles...

Et si les autres ne comprennent pas notre anglais ce topic a dejà 14 pages, ce qui veut dire qu'on pourrait creer un site que pour nous francophones!!!! Hahahahh!!!

There is no reason to believe IMDB Trivia is wrong.

Even De Niro, who worked a lot with Scorcese, said the best director he worked with was Leone.

Tu vas à quelle fac de ciné?

DYS has plenty of funny moments too!!

I read that he wanted to start a "after american dream trilogy" too.

Here's what I posted in another topic (i don't remeber where i read this...) :


"The first shot was to be the camera making a zoom out from a room in Stalingrad through the window, we can see the building, in ruins, then as long as the camera is still doing a zoom out we can see the city and the river next to it and then the camera stops and you can see (as in the beginning of star wars episode IV) the german airplanes stuka reaching the city.

All of this with Shostacovich "Stalingrad" Symphony in the background.

This movie was extremely important in Leone's Vision.

Leone analyses "american dream" in his spaghetti westerns and in OUTA and he concludes that the american dream doesn't exist no more and that in even when it existed, in order to achieve it you had to give away all your child dreams and become a violent and evil man in a violent and evil system.

With "900 days" he wanted to explore the other "broken dream", the sovietic one, telling a love story in a terrible war background.

Leone was not communist. If you don(t believe just watch the Juan/Rod Steiger speach about revolution in DYS. Leone was more an anarchist to me. It is clear to me that he wouldn't show an optimist vision of the Soviet Union and the communist system, but a dark one.

Jean Jacques Annaud took Leone's project (he told it himself) and transformed it simply into......"

Dear Titoli: do you realy think Leone's movies doesn't makes you reflect and they don't live with you after you have seen them?

Do you think his profound study of the United States and the end of the american dream on OUTW and OUTA is not a matter of reflection? Or that the speech of Rod Steiger about revolution on DYS is not a deep an excelent analysis of the implication of a revolution?

From my own part I can only see OUTA once a year because of its extreme sadness and pesimism, wich are key elements and a vision of life.

Not a single movie by Godard makes that effect on me.

No doubt to me: James Coburn/Sean introduction before the explosions and in that motrocycle!

Well, this is to me the central question of cinema and it is linked with another topic discussed recently on the forum: "Is Leone an autheur?". What is the meaning of this?

Let's start by the beginning: do we agree that cinema masterpieces are first of all a revolutionnary and artistic way to tell a story? Let's think for a moment in Orson Wells, Stanley Kubrick, Sergio Leone. Are they more artists in the way of treating the light and the sound in a movie or are the fantastic storytellers??? The answer is both, no doubt, but what comes first? What each one of us think that comes first?

Why don't we make a voting, let's say for about one month, in order to choose those 20 movies? It would be a true "Sergio Leone Board" top list made by Sergio Leone and spaghetti westerns fans.

Indeed my fellow countryman, I forgot what discussions you are talking about. But I assume it must be the discussions around the meaning of cinema. Is cinema a good story? A way to tell a story? Or just THE way to tell a story, the artistic way to tell a story?

Was it this?

Only in some compilations (excelent compilations by the way) like "Mondo Morricone" or "More Mondo Morricone":

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0000072CD/qid=1116270170/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/002-3681301-6663220?v=glance&s=music

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0007UTVBC/qid=1116270170/sr=1-3/ref=sr_1_3/002-3681301-6663220?v=glance&s=music

If you don't want to pay for the cds, I saw the 2 cds on Soulseek.

And by the way, there is a huge amount of Morricone tracks on Soulseek, more than I ever saw elsewhere.