Sergio Leone Web Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 30, 2022, 12:21:58 AM

Show Posts

Messages | * Topics | Attachments

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - titoli

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 74
Other Films / Inginocchiati straniero... i cadaveri non fanno ombra! (1970)
« on: September 03, 2021, 02:00:40 AM »
By Fidani's standards this is a kolossal: at least 50 people can be watched on the screen and the women are real, not just men in drag. The story is a mess, though if some plot twists had been better concocted might have earned a 6/10 rating for the flick. For example, Jack Betts appiies a kind of silencer to his gun, but for no apparent reason. again, Betts and Borelli concoct a plan to deceive the killers, but the viewer doesn't know what the plan is and we know that Betts planned to deceive Borelli who, instead, deceived Betts by killing (we don't know how) Manni and so on. And the title: yes, the corpses make no shadow. But why a stranger ought to kneel first? Anyway, this gets a 4-5/10.

Other Films / Perche' uccidi ancora (Why Go On Killing?) (1965)
« on: September 02, 2021, 03:31:18 PM »
Steffen is his father's avenger and kills (almost) all of the 17 who shot at him. There are some not bad confrontation scenes (the ones who have him kill the two brothers) but still it is too stretched out and at 85' is 50' too long. It is well shot (or maybe is the copy at youtube which is VG) and the bare spanish landscapes are new to me. Ida Galli is pretty as usual and Berti plays a good villain. And Stanley Kent is not Stelio Candelli and Lewis (sic) Induni is nowhere to be seen.  5/10

Off-Topic Discussion / The House on 92nd Street (1945) Noir?
« on: August 18, 2021, 02:04:50 PM »
Can't see how. Corny narration, semi-documentary style coupled with hollywooden plot (based on real events? I doubt it), usual nazi morons. Only good  thing is Nolan's performance. 4/10

Off-Topic Discussion / Roger Touhy, Gangster (1944)
« on: August 05, 2021, 04:15:01 PM »
I read Touhy's autobio a couple of weeks ago and though the facts therein, with maybe a couple of exceptions, are mostly fantasy, I was intrigued by this Chicago bootlegger who stood up to Capone and was imprisoned for a  kidnapping  that never happened. The movie was made after Touhy's escape from Stateville prison and is centered on the kidnapping (that never was), the prison time and the escape and final recapture. Of course, nobody knew that ten years later a judge would rule Touhy as innocent of the bogus kidnapping, though that didn't mean he was free as he had to spend another 5 years before being granted parole. And being murdered a month later by some mob killers. And the "victim" of the kidnapping (actually an international swindler) was granted a pardon by President Kennedy!
The movie cannot be judged as from its initial 95 minutes the Hays office required a 30'cut of violent scenes. A pity because you have a notable cast and a competent director. The final 10' are surely noir both as to photography and to angles.   

Off-Topic Discussion / Under the Gun (1951)
« on: July 21, 2021, 06:22:15 AM »
This is actually a prison movie with a frame which, plotwise, makes little sense if not for giving Totter (not particularly attractive here at 34) a part. But the prison part is excellent, all based on the trick of the prisoner-warden (shooter, more precisely) and the pardon scheme (was it for real? If so I can't imagine some delinquent waiting for somebody to escape to shoot at him. Anyway, it's the USA). Conte is great and so is Jaffe, McIntire and Totter playing just a minor part. Plotwise, the frame makes little sense (why does Conte get to the town where he knows one of his victim's brother wants a revenge? And how can he be so sure Totter won't flip on him? And why  he doesn't lift Jaffe's diary? And why Totter is waiting for him and go on the lam instead?). Without the frame it would be 8-9/10, as it is it's 7/10. 

And it steals from that movie the fire lighting trick (but it gives it a bigger role) and the "baby" calling. Ann Savage never did anything for me and all the more so here with a terrible hair-do. But though the photography cannot even be compared to the one of the original the pace is very fast in the second half and makes for a suspenseful vision. I think a noir fan must see it. 7/10

Off-Topic Discussion / Accomplice (1946) blanc c
« on: July 09, 2021, 12:22:25 PM »
Not even a b production and not noir as it is all shot in daytime and exteriors. Which makes it interesting, at least for me. I've got the novel but I haven't managed to read it yet. Not that understanding better  the plot will make any difference. It's the landscapes and the cars and the roads and even the last kinda castle-villa which make it unique and (I'm almost afraid to say it) refreshing after watching so many studio shot movies of the kind. So I give it 6/10.
On youtube.

Off-Topic Discussion / Chandler (1971) the neo-noir that never was
« on: April 11, 2021, 04:03:57 AM »
So what it was? I don't know. I wondered for decades about a movie with that evocative title about a P.I. but almost didn't make it to Europe. Now I understand why.  This is so inept that one may suspect is a parody (see the attack under the rain with the villains dressed in black trenchcoats). I couldn't make anything of the story, I just couldn't follow it and there's just little action for a movie like this. The characters are not existent, starting from Oates himself: you know next to nothing about him at the start and at the end you have made no progress at all. The villains? Yeah, about the same. Caron? Still nice legs. Some noir shots toward the end and some interesting exterior of California in 1970 and interior of a train serving the area. That earns it a 3-4/10

Other Films / The Vanquished (1953)
« on: April 10, 2021, 01:07:10 AM »
This is mostly shot at night, it has a murder scheme so CJ would probably consider it a noir?  Of course, it isn't. Interesting the Garfield review:"Clean-up-the-town yarn has saloon songs added to stretch the weary plot. Rheumy. " There is actually a "song" in the movie and it is one sung in church by the congregation. And no saloon in sight, unless you wanna consider such a sorta male club.  The plot is not "weary", because there are not many westerns (conceding they make the genre) based on the reconstruction and carpetbaggers: probably Garfield misunderstood the  review on which he based his own. The plot is quite flimsy but it mildly interesting until it turns into the usual sham murder to trap the innocent. But Coleen Gray is beautiful. 6/10

Other Films / In Old Arizona (1928)
« on: April 02, 2021, 02:27:47 PM »
Oscar for Baxter, the Cisco Kid. Walsh lost his eye while shooting it. First all-sound western, but it wasn't worth the while. Too much talk and little action. 4/10

Other Films / The Outcast (1954)
« on: March 31, 2021, 12:53:03 PM »
Run-of-the-mill revenge plot of the nephew who had his inheritance stolen from his uncle. Without Derek and with an actor could have made 6/10.

Other Films / Nevada (1944)
« on: March 28, 2021, 02:46:50 PM »
Mitchum's first starring role in a run-of-the mill B-C oater.

Other Films / They Rode West (1954)
« on: March 28, 2021, 01:18:10 PM »
"Good production, routine plot."(Garfield) I think the finale was routine but the rest no routine at all. Especially for 1954. Excellent production values and, of course, Karlson as a director makes it highly pro. No, the story is no routine at all and is well acted with two lookers as Reed and Wynn that never turns this into melodrama. I don't like westerns with Indians but this gets a solid 7/10

Other Films / The Silver Whip (1953)
« on: March 28, 2021, 11:22:17 AM »
"Good cast and noisy action. But the directing is lightweight and the script too slow...". (Gsrfield) I don't think so. The movie is 73' and has got no filling moments. About the direction being lightweight, I don't know what it means: the action scenes are well done, especially the stagecoach ambuscade (any action scene, in a western, must be "noisy"). So it's 7/10.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 74


SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines