But even as a "die-hard Eastwood-fan", I think he would have been wrong as Harmonica. Would have been fun to see him, Wallach and van Cleefe gunned down in the beginning, however....
i don't believe for one second that leone ever had any intention of having eastwood play harmonica if bronson signs on... maybe leone was just humoring eastwood, or just looking for a backup plan... leone had expressed his desire to work with guys like fonda, coburn, and bronson his whole career... i doubt he'd take anyone over them.
Can someone please explain something to me.Admittedly, I have only seen OUATITW once, and I was not as blown away by it as most seem to be... but that's another story.I watched the movie after becoming interested in the original trilogy, and perhaps I was disappointed because I was expecting more of the same, and to me, Bronson seemed like a poor-man's Eastwood.Many may disagree, and that's fine, but it's just the way I saw it then... but I need to watch it again.I had even convinced myself that the part was written for Eastwood, and Leone just gave it to Bronson when he knocked it back, replacing his trademark cigar with a Harmonica... The one thing that made me believe this most was the scene in which Harmonica turns up in the night at the womans house, and all she can hear is the Harmonica... all of a sudden, he lights a match... WHY?If it was Eastwood, I could understand that it was his trademark entrance, lighting a cigar... It would have been cool to see it in the dark as well... but why would harmonica do it?If someone can explain this to me properly I will gladly withdraw my comments about the harmonica character...