I remember it as boring. I don't think I'll give it another chance.
I remember liking it back in the day. CJ, your write-ups make me want to re-visit it. Good on ya.
I watched it recently with the audio commentary and Friedkin was entertaining to listen to. I seen it twice straight through but it just didn't click with me. Maybe another view is in order.
What exactly didn't click, the story, the characters, the cinematography? I'm curious now.
Maybe it was Dafoe's character that really didn't interest me as a villain. I can't really remember EXACTLY what I didn't connect with. I'll give it a watch sometime next week and try and answer that question.
And then Turturro: his part of the story could be erased as it has no relevance to the development of the plot (BTW, I do not understand how Petersen got to him again).
Another thing that doesn't work, as hinted, it's the Dafoe's character: it is not well delved into, he is not shown in his dealings with other criminals, except with the black one who should manage Turturro killing (a goofy scene: how is he supposed to be killed?).
Now, it is true that the car chase is tops, but is it credible that the undercover agent never reveals himself even when fronting potential killers? And is it also credible that the sniper shoots him dead by mistake? And the "back from the dead" (or almost) of the cop who kills Dafoe? Bah...Anyway, not a noir or neo-post noir or whatever you wanna call it: this is cop movie, in my book. 6/10
Turturro is supposed to be stabbed to death by those inmates.
The car accident that hit the FBI car on the bridge jarred the sniper enough the throw the sniper's shot off.
Bullshit it's a noir by my Noir-dar, in the vein of Rough Cop (1954) and Shield For Murder (1954), you got Peterson as the obsessed and alienated individual, plus the stylistic noir cinematography good enough for me.
No knife to be seen, at least by me. I missed it?
Yeah: a true professional.
Obsessed and alienated? He's just out for vengeance, as in millions of other cops and western movies.
Another circumstance I can't explain is why Petersen's pard, after having discovered Dafoe's lair with all the printing material (after the call to the paintress who gives him the lead), does nothing about it: that's another loose end, isn't it? They'd just have to wait for him to get there and nab him.
And generally, the impression is that, if Petersen is willing to violate so many rules, why he just doesn't get Dafoe and gets rid of him?
It looked to me that they were making stabbing motions.
Hell yes obsessed and alienated character is a Noir trope along with events spiraling out of control. What the fuck do you think Noir has to have a femme fatale and a detective in a trench coat? I can't help it millions of cop movies and westerns do this. that is why I called them NIPOs Noir In Plot Only. For me to be a Neo Noir you got to have that stylistic visual component This film has this in spades.
Nab him for what being an artist, having printing equipment?