Well I don't think killing people in cold blood was part of Navarro's character. I only remember the one gun hanging in the house that was hidden from sight. Of course he isn't going to simply kill Sancho and co. at the first available moment as it wasn't the right time and it is just a movie after all. Plus, he had eyes on the money and he was so cocky and assured of his abilities, he could kill the bad guys at literally any time he wanted. Such is the scene wherein he is tied up and is being beat up by Sancho and one of his men. They even tell him he's going to die and Ringo, now "helpless" is still able to dupe Sancho into "partnering" with him.IMO, this is one of the best ever, and one of my all time favorites.
There are old firearms hanging from the walls: judging from how the Austerlitz gun is kept in order, they should funcion as well. There is a gang member just behind Navarro when she points the gun at the sheriff. Also she taunts the sheriff's fiancée about her inability to kill. And anyway, if she's not able to kill in cold blood, other gang members should evade this task. But not only they don't kill the sheriff, but don't even put it in a cell a take the keys away. Or shoot him in a leg. What it strikes as awkward is the instant reaction of the sheriff which thwarts the gang's plans for an escape. And to make Ringo's hesitancy more acceptable it would have sufficed to keep more gang members alive.
It seems like I'm the only one who didn't like the movie which I found interminable, stupid
And yet you gave it a 6/10?Generous!