Sergio Leone Web Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 22, 2017, 06:07:47 AM
Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
News:


+  Sergio Leone Web Board
|-+  Other/Miscellaneous
| |-+  Off-Topic Discussion (Moderators: cigar joe, moviesceleton, Dust Devil)
| | |-+  The Path to 9/11 (2006)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: The Path to 9/11 (2006)  (Read 4145 times)
dave jenkins
Bounty Killer
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13684

"One banana, two banana, three banana, four...."


View Profile
« on: September 13, 2006, 09:16:18 AM »

The film in a nutshell:

mise-en-scene: Soderbergh's Traffic ("Establishing shots? What establishing shots? We don't need no stinkin' establishing shots!")

slow-burn moral outrage: Tora, Tora, Tora ("The fools! The blind, unthinking fools!")

Harvey Keitel: School of Tarantino (Stooge: "...and leave you with your balls hanging out to dry in the wind." HK/Mr. Wolf/John P. O'Neil: "Not these balls.")

Logged


That's what you get, Drink, for being such an annoying Melville fanboy.
dave jenkins
Bounty Killer
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13684

"One banana, two banana, three banana, four...."


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2006, 10:54:18 AM »

Then, of course, there is always this:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/09/the_path_to_911a_postmortem.html

Logged


That's what you get, Drink, for being such an annoying Melville fanboy.
titoli
Bounty Killer
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8010



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2006, 12:39:23 PM »

Quote
When ABC cut portions of the most controversial segments before airing the film

Looks like you're in for another uncut italian release, uh?

Logged

dave jenkins
Bounty Killer
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13684

"One banana, two banana, three banana, four...."


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2006, 10:33:28 AM »

 Grin But I'm sure we'll get an uncut version on DVD here.

Logged


That's what you get, Drink, for being such an annoying Melville fanboy.
Jon0
Guest
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2006, 11:31:44 AM »

I haven't seen it, but I've heard it's pretty innaccurate...ie. that Clinton didn't have covert ops in Afghanistan just about to catch Bin Laden, etc. etc.

Logged
Sackett
Gunslinger
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 253


One revolution is more than enough for me.


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 14, 2006, 04:38:23 PM »

Strange, I heard it was accurate concerning Clinton.  All the more odd that a major network would actually air it if Clinton is made to look bad.

Logged
Groggy
Bounty Killer
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11458


This post gets Agnew's stamp of approval!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2006, 04:54:33 PM »

Controversial equals "dares to criticize Clinton".  Republicans complain when they're portrayed inaccurately, but how often do they get shows pulled off the air and re-edited?

I have very mixed feelings in regards to Clinton's handling of terrorism.  I think he went about dealing with the problem the wrong way ("proportional" military response, trying to arrest Bin Laden, dealing with other countries who were at least somewhat sympathetic to al-Qaeda), but he was just following his predecessors from Carter onward.  And a lot of his mistakes weren't his fault, i.e. a commando team assembled by the Pakistani government to capture OBL was disbanded because the Pakistani government had been overthrown.  I'm critical of Clinton but I won't go too far in my criticism, because he wasn't any more wrong-headed than Carter, Reagan, or Bush I were. . .

Logged


Saturday nights with Groggy
cigar joe
Moderator
Bounty Killer
*****
Online Online

Posts: 12713


easy come easy go


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 14, 2006, 05:02:30 PM »

Quote
Controversial equals "dares to criticize Clinton".  Republicans complain when they're portrayed inaccurately, but how often do they get shows pulled off the air and re-edited?

What do you mean? Cool

They just recently made a big stink over the Ronald Regan film that starred Alec Baldwin, remember. I think that ended up going strait to DVD.




« Last Edit: September 14, 2006, 05:04:22 PM by cigar joe » Logged

"When you feel that rope tighten on your neck you can feel the devil bite your ass"!
Groggy
Bounty Killer
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11458


This post gets Agnew's stamp of approval!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: September 14, 2006, 05:42:57 PM »

What do you mean? Cool

They just recently made a big stink over the Ronald Regan film that starred Alec Baldwin, remember. I think that ended up going strait to DVD.

Really?  Which one was that?  Huh

Logged


Saturday nights with Groggy
cigar joe
Moderator
Bounty Killer
*****
Online Online

Posts: 12713


easy come easy go


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2006, 05:28:03 AM »

I screwed up its Ackerman not Baldwin and it stared James Brolin as Reagan.

CBS canceled it under pressure.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0383139/


http://www.brokennewz.com/displaystory.asp_Q_storyid_E_646reaganjacko

« Last Edit: September 15, 2006, 05:29:47 AM by cigar joe » Logged

"When you feel that rope tighten on your neck you can feel the devil bite your ass"!
dave jenkins
Bounty Killer
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13684

"One banana, two banana, three banana, four...."


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2006, 01:50:23 PM »

Of course, the shows are very different. The Reagan piece was a hatchet job on Mr. and Mrs. Reagan, The Path to 9/11 was largely about John O'Neil that showed him increasingly at odds with a government's bad policy. That policy remained in force after the Clinton administration left office, so there is plenty of blame to go around. The movie is evenhanded about it: Albright and Sandy Berger look like obstructionist wankers, but Cheney and Rice come off as clueless buffoons. Why do the Clintonistas expect special treatment?

Logged


That's what you get, Drink, for being such an annoying Melville fanboy.
Groggy
Bounty Killer
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11458


This post gets Agnew's stamp of approval!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2006, 03:55:38 PM »

The movie is evenhanded about it: Albright and Sandy Berger look like obstructionist wankers, but Cheney and Rice come off as clueless buffoons. Why do the Clintonistas expect special treatment?

My point exactly.

Logged


Saturday nights with Groggy
dave jenkins
Bounty Killer
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13684

"One banana, two banana, three banana, four...."


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: August 15, 2008, 05:56:53 PM »

All other docu-dramas are OK, this is the only one that bends the truth. Yeah, right.
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-path15-2008aug15,0,4263402.story

Logged


That's what you get, Drink, for being such an annoying Melville fanboy.
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



Visit FISTFUL-OF-LEONE.COM

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.039 seconds with 19 queries.