"The Hoods" seems to be now widely available in paperback at a fairly low cost and a copy is in the post to me. I'm not expecting much but it may help me to expand my knowledge and understanding of the film and the story on which it is based.
"When I look at it," she explains, "there's a really seamless quality to the scenes with the children, that the scenes with the adults never quite achieve. When Sergio was working with the kids - who were very pliable, who were going to do what he told them - there's a sense about the film that this is what he really wanted. "But with the adults, there was this feeling that Sergio and De Niro were on slightly different tracks. De Niro was so interested in realistic detail and was often concerned that there wasn't enough of it, and Sergio could not have been less interested..." she tails off, then rallies with a slightly more positive spin: "They were both after creating a good piece of work, so I suppose it was the best kind of fight."
... egocentric folk who want more scenes, never less.
That she realised this as they were filming it on the day is a great piece of insight for an actor, as they are by nature egocentric folk who want more scenes, never less.
Juan, Juan, Juan . . . "fewer" for countable nouns. Sorry, to pick on you, but I see this more and more and it just has to stop. What will become of marmota's English if the proper forms are not observed here?
Juan, Juan, Juan . . . "fewer" for countable nouns.
I agree with Slowstir. For all the Elizabeth-as-Deborah detractors out there, I think she did a very good job in the part - certainly making her fairly brief appearance memorable. I don't even think her 1968 scenes were that bad.