Nobody (2021) - 8/10. A History of Violence meets John Wick . . . and the laughs never stop. This is a film with a moral, too: "the family that slays together, stays together." Great to see those icons from the 80s back in action again, Christopher Lloyd and Michael Ironside. And Bob Odenkirk (OdenWick?) . . . an action star? Who knew? Somewhere Chekhov uttered the dictim: when you show a Claymore mine at the beginning of Act 3, it must go off by the end of the picture. Happily, this film follows that rule.
OK, but what makes this noir? Isn't it just a meller with a killer ending? Yeah, Selby lists it, but I'm still skeptical.
Jack Reacher (2012) 9/10. 4K. A shooting spree that kills five people is blamed on an Iraqi War veteran, but a well-groomed drifter appears and begins investigating. Maybe the vet was set up? This is a film based on a book in a popular series featuring the Reacher character (which I have not read). I was going to skip this (who wants to see another Tom Cruise film?), but when I heard that Werner Herzog was in it playing the Prince of Darkness, I had to go. Turns out this is a lot of fun. The plotting is good, the investigation unfolds rather well, Cruise isn't too annoying, and the cast includes Richard Jenkins (no relation) and Rosamund Pike (nice jugs). Robert Duval shows up as a folksy gun range operator named Gunny. Pittsburg, PA, is the featured location.But, of course, the main interest is with Werner, brief though his appearance is. SPOILER BEGINS:His character is called the Zec, which, we are told, is Russian for prisoner. Apparently, before he became an American crime lord, the Zec spent time in the Gulag. He explains to an underling (an underling about to be disciplined) that in order to survive, the Zec once had to gnaw off the fingers on his hands. This is an object lesson for the underling; the Zec wants to demonstrate that he will do anything to survive. He shows the man his hands. Is the underling willing to show that he too will do anything to survive? The man, taking the hint, has one question.Aren't you gonna give me a knife?Did I have a knife in Siberia?The guy sticks his thumb in his mouth and starts chewing, but he can't really go through with it, so he breaks down crying.The scene ends with Werner intoning: I don't understand. Always the bullet.END SPOILERThe big shootout climax occurs in a quarry, and, though clich?d, is actually exciting. Unfortunately, it was here that the automatic systems in the theater malfunctioned, first shutting off the sound, bringing the house lights up, and finally, just as Cruise was winning the hand-to-hand with Henchman #1, stopping the image. So I did not get to see what happened to Werner. I'd like to think that just as Cruise was about to apprehend him, he disappeared in a puff of smoke. Any chance of a Jack Reacher 2?
And as I remember, they DID make a sequel, and it isn't very good.
Il Buco (Michelangelo Frammartino, 2021)- 8.5/10If you're wondering what an adventure movie could look like in the 2020's, watch Il Buco. Terrific retelling of the story of young speleologists in Italy in 1961 expoloring what turned out to be the 3rd deepest cave in the world (at the time). The movie is strongly anarrative. Nobody breaks a leg, nobody gets stuck between two rocks while the water levels are raising. You just watch speleologists doing what they do. Exploring, climbing, mapping out. There is a strong documentary value to it, which deeply relates to the original cinematic experience. The fact that the movie was shot with a small crew in the real cave, almost in documentary conditions, increases the adventure feeling by a lot. As the movie critics clich? says: if you want to be scared by a shark on screen, you need to be little scared that the camera operator gets bitten. Well that's what happens here. Now this isn't for everyone (as is: this isn't for Drink). It's slow, it's almost silent (they rarely speak and when they do you cannot decipher what is being said. Think of Tati, but in italian) although the sound plays a huge role in it. Apart from an old sheperd whose face is shot like a landscape (does it ring a bell, Leone fans?), you rarely see faces in the movie. The group of speleologists is shot as a group: wide shots, no distinctions. The movie does what it can to NOT make them protagonists. It's also occasionally quite funny (i told you it wasn't for Drink). Politicaly speaking it is for everyone though: if you're left wing you'll see the movie as anticapitalist, if you're right wing you'll see a rejection of modernity, if you're religious you'll see it as filled with spirituality. And you'll be right in any of those scenarios. The gorgeous cinematography by Renato Berta finishes to sell the thing: it seems it was shot with only the "natural" lights available. It means that inside the cave, the light comes from the lights mounted on the speleologists' helmets. The rest is only darkness. It's funny because what could lead to some very "cinema verit?" style on the contrary makes real world look like incredible paintings... or aventure movies scenes. And it makes you, on the same time, want to lick the screen, want to go on an adventure, and intensely watch the screen to discover what the real world looks like.Dont watch the trailer, which doesn't tell you much, but try this 50 seconds clip instead: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0-FDNwSKQQ
Well, I'm interested, but how do I see it?
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade - 12/10Still the adventure flick for the whole family masterpiece. As everybody knows, and this is NOT open to discussion: 3>1>2>4
Is "Last Crusade" the one with Sean Connery? I remember not liking it at the time, but since I will never return to any of these in the future, I'm willing to accept your verdict.
Now, shall we talk about movies?