Mad Men: The Series - 6/10First off, that rating is for two reasons on top of it being a long show: it's boring, and it's redundant. It's not something I really look forward to watching, but went through all of it considering I was already halfway through when I decided I was mostly bored with it. That being said, the characters are some of the most subtly and realistically developed in, well, maybe every story I've ever witnessed. That's partially due to that it's maybe the longest story I've ever sat through at 90 hours (including novels, probably). Plot-wise, I think Mad Men could have been 4 seasons. However, the character development is absolutely flawless in that you don't even realize you're watching them grow years right in front of you - maybe that's what the 7 seasons are for. In Breaking Bad (10/10 in comparison for the record), while the Walt character develops brilliantly, the changes in his persona are clearly highlighted by specific incidents (the heroin scene with Jessie and his girlfriend, the Lily of the Valley plant, etc.). Mad Men has sort of the Boyhood effect instead, where nothing huge really happens to effect the ensemble cast, yet characters personalities change with age and career status. It's brilliantly accomplished, and the most novelistic thing I've seen in film/television.Also, it's hard to describe those last 7 episodes ...but the pacing, setting, and feeling of them is masterful. It all felt incredibly dreamlike, similar to the final minutes of Once Upon a Time in America or The Master, or the epilogue of a very long novel.And the outdoor cinematography, while rare and far in between offices and dark bars, is beautiful.Any time Jon Hamm breaks the Don Draper character (season 4 "The Suitcase" for example), he deserves an award. he's damn good.But man, 92 episodes later, that show was pretty fucking boring.
I never managed to sit trough a full episode after the pilot. I've seen tens of single scenes on YouTube or on TV. I like the atmosphere, I like the art direction, I like the premise and I like most of the performances. But every single time, the situations were among the most boring, predictable and cliché I had ever seen (which means, of course, that they lasted too long). Seriously, drastically reduce the budget of a Mad Men scene and you'll soon not be able to know that you're not watching The Young and the Restless. It's a shame because I do not doubt that watching the whole thing is greatly rewarding for many reasons, including the ones that RR mentioned.I even found myself fzst forwarding the most "pop" scene they ever did (according to the buzz at the time): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXoILGnHnvMAnyway, like I told many people already, I'll try more seriously some day. After the new X Files and Twin Peaks episodes. May be.
No, no, no, Mad Men is fantastic but ... ... but I haven't watched it complete yet. And I have to admit that in the 6th season, despite being great in parts, things began to repeat a bit, so that the 6th season could not maintain the high level of seasons 1 - 5. I also might admit that I needed half of the first season to really come into it. And that it then were the following seasons in which the real fascination started.Mad Men is doubtless one of the best US series of the last 15 years.
I noticed you tend to like shows that have more to do with literature than cinema in the way they tell a story and develop their characters: Mad Men, The Sopranos and The Wire. Do you also like 6 Feet Under?
He, he, if you want to tell me that Breaking Bad is more cinematic than Man Men and Los Sopranos, it is not. Actually it is also the sublime directing which makes MM and Les Sopranos really great.
I was not trying to lure you into such a trick I was talking about the screenwriting.But BB's still more cinematic in EVERY WAY than anything you mentioned.