Mission: Impossible: Fallout (2018) IMAX 2D - 9/10. The plot is recycled from every thriller ever made but, of course, is just an excuse for the action set-pieces. Locations include Paris, London, Kashmir (or its double). The helicopter duel at the end is a gas. Took the wife, her first IMAX experience, seemed to enjoy it, but later complained about motion sickness. Suck it up, newbie! The $18 admission fee included a T-shirt with the message "See It in IMAX." Yeah, baby!
Ps: the geography of the Paris scene is total nonsense, they get teleported from a side of the city to the other side every few seconds. They even say “metro Bastille” when they obviously are at the total opposite. I guess they always do that but it’s funny when you know the place.
First fruits from the Jacques Becker retro at Film Forum . . . Les aventures d'Arsène Lupin (1957) - 8/10. Three episodes and an epilog concerning the gentleman thief Arsène Lupin (Robert Lamoureux). In the first, Lupin boosts priceless oils from under the noses of hosts and guests at a swank party; in the second, Lupin makes off with jewels in a hotel (hmmm, I've seen that bureau-against-the-wall gag somewhere before); finally, Kaiser Wilhelm II calls in Lupin to test the invulnerability of a new hiding place (but Lupin has other plans). Although separate, the three episodes build and there are characters from the first who return in the second and third (and then in the epilog). This film is full of wit and invention, and a Technicolor marvel. It is completely unknown in the U.S.--for last night's screening they had to bring in a guy from the French consulate to generate subtitles for simultaneous projection. The image was immaculate, however. Surely this has been restored, so there must be a Blu in the offing. If so, I will purchase it, with or without subtitles.
Barry Lyndon - 8.5/10Like DJ the other time, I was slightly annoyed by the overuse of slow zoom in/out. They even create some jarring cuts when we jump from a zoom to a still shot without waiting for the zoom to finish its course. Of course, there is the occasional handled shot that works pretty well, but that's a film that would have HUGELY benefited from more dolly/steadycam shots. The incredible extended steadycam shot of Lord Bullingdon entering the palace to defy Barry towards the end makes the whole thing even more painful: the camera goes from a beautiful set to another and let the audience witness how magnificent Kubrick's static compositions look with dolly in/out movements.
Side note: I wrote "first serious HD viewing" at the beginning of the post because I've put the movie in the background a couple of time while working in the last 12 months while working. The sound was turned of while I used Spotify. I was amazed to see how great the images work with the soundtrack of The Social Network or The Neon Demon as well as with some Gesaffelstein tracks. Kubrick played an important role in bringing electronic music to mainstream audience with Clockwork Orange and the fact that modern electronic music still complement his images says a lot about his work.
It's my understanding that steadycam was not available in 1975. In fact, I believe that The Shining was the first film Kubrick used it on. Perhaps, then, the truly amazing thing to note is that Kubrick got steadycam results without even needing to use it!
You should try Dark Side of the Moon (as has been done with 2001). In fact, Kubrick's approach to filming lends itself to any number of soundtrack accompaniments. It even works with pieces of shopworn classical music.
It's interesting you mention the final duel scene. That's the one scene Kubrick invented for the film (in the book Bullingdon merely gives Barry a severe beating). My theory is that Kubrick wanted to appropriate some of the elan on view in Leone's cinema and decided to use a showdown for the climax. Smart man!
This retrospective has allowed me to fill in most of the Becker films I hadn't seen. Now that I've seen most every one of his features I think I can make a few observations. First, he made a handful of films that are justly famous (Casque d'or; Grisbi; The Hole) and one or two that, though not as well known, are good (the one about Modigliani; Arsene Lupin). But he made a lot of mediocre films as well. For the most part the films are well made, but the subjects aren't always worthwhile (his youth "trilogy"). He doesn't seem to have exercised much discernment when choosing projects. So he was a great craftsman, certainly, but no auteur.